Service Cuts vs. Revenue
Top 10 Questions for Northland Candidates (2025)
Service Cuts vs. Revenue
Facing budget pressures, would you prioritize cutting services, finding efficiencies, or raising revenue? Give an example.
To demonstrate how the website will display candidate responses, I’ve provided sample answers to the same questions. While I’m not a candidate in the local elections, I’ve included my own responses and photo as an example. My name has been omitted to avoid any confusion.
Please answer the question, but limit your answer to 750 characters:
Candidates Name:
*Candidates Name*
Balanced Budget Approach
I'd pursue all three strategically:
-
Efficiencies First
Example: Consolidating back-office functions across councils to reduce duplication -
Targeted Revenue
Example: Progressive rates structure where higher-value properties pay slightly more -
Service Protection
Example: Keeping core services (water, waste) fully funded while trimming non-essentials like event sponsorships
The key is transparent decision-making - showing residents exactly where every dollar goes and why. We must preserve essential services while innovating to do more with less.